Uniform & Rank Inconsistencies
Frequency of uniform changes
Starfleet's uniform styles were switched in very irregular intervals, and usually not consistently for all the ranks and divisions. The uniforms worn by Earth Starfleet in the 2150's are not discussed here, since they predate any other style by 100 years, and there may have been an unknown number of modifications from Enterprise to "The Cage". It is only worth mentioning that on the otherwise navy blue jumpsuits the departments on Enterprise NX-01 are already distinguished by thin stripes of different colors: yellow for command, red for engineering and security, green for science. The latter is a presumption -- this would make Hoshi a scientist rather than an officer with an executive position.
Also on a side note, the crew of the Kelvin in "Star Trek (2009)" can be seen with still different uniform colors than in any other time frame. The "command" color, as worn by Captain Robau and George Kirk, appears to be blue. Since these events in the movie predate the TOS pilots by more than 20 years, it is possible that a yet unknown uniform exists at the time. Still, it would be extremely odd if there used to be yet another permutation of departmental colors -- unless Robau, Kirk and many more of the bridge crew of this science ship were wearing a blue science uniform.
The pastel-colored uniforms of the pilot "The Cage" (2254) were also in use in "Where No Man Has Gone Before" (2265), with slight modifications to the rank signs. With the beginning of TOS (2266), the more colorful yellow, red and blue uniform shirts were introduced. Although this is the by far most famous style in the real world, the TOS colors were extremely short-lived in the Trek Universe, as they must have been abandoned some time prior to TMP (2271), when several new uniform patterns with toned down colors could be seen, plus a new standardized Starfleet emblem (actually the former Enterprise emblem).
Some time between TMP and "Star Trek II" (2285), there must have been yet another change of uniforms, a radical one this time. The shirts were supplemented with asymmetrical jackets, the colors of most uniform jackets narrowed down to red only, and the rank signs became quite different from anything seen so far. The department was still indicated by the shirt colors, but usually only their collar was visible. These red uniforms must have been introduced prior to 2278, the year that the USS Bozeman came from, whose crew was already wearing this style (TNG: "Cause and Effect"). This movie pattern remained in use unchanged for another fifteen years, at least until the maiden voyage of the Enterprise-B in "Generations" (2293). Surprisingly, basically the same untypical uniform style was preserved for an extraordinarily long time. A slight variant of the movie uniform could be seen as late as in the mid-24th century, only without the colored pullover collar underneath the jacket and later without the belt. The tailoring remained the same. This simplified uniform was consistently used in in Q's recreated past TNG: "Tapestry" (2327), in TNG: "Yesterday's Enterprise" (2344) and still by Jack Crusher in a holographic recording in TNG: "Family" (2349). The re-use of the movie uniforms was an obvious choice, as it helped save production budget. Anyway, Starfleet must have eventually retired it between 2349 and 2355, knowing that Picard's crew in the flashbacks in TNG: "The Battle" (2355) wore Starfleet standard issue of the 2360's, the same as in early TNG.
It is interesting to note that at the beginning of TNG (2364), after 80 years, Starfleet's uniforms returned to a style of different uniform shirt colors for the departments (TNG I). Rank signs are since then reduced to small ranks pips, which are consistently worn also with the three following 24th century uniforms. For some time there used to be a female variant with a skirt again, and even men were occasionally seen with a shirt (tentatively named "skant" by the costume designers). The early TNG unisex uniform of 2364 was a jumpsuit, but later modified to a shirt-&-pants version with a belt (2366). Also, a collar was added. This new uniform (TNG II) was initially only worn by the higher ranking officers (or rather the main characters) until the end of 2366. On a different note, a variety of admiral's uniforms is known, all following the same basic pattern, but with slightly different jackets.
After only three years yet another a new uniform came to life, with the colors of the upper and lower half of the shirt reversed and a new bluish gray collar. Also, a new communicator was introduced, replacing the oval body with a rounded trapezoid. This uniform was worn on DS9 (2369), but did not affect the style on the Enterprise until the end of TNG (2370). Quite obviously the real-world reason is that it should be easier for the viewer to keep the two different series apart. The DS9 uniform may have been supposed to be an additional, maybe more practical variant to the TNG style. But the first TNG feature film "Generations" (2371) had a total uniform chaos. Both the TNG and DS9 style were worn in parallel (the main characters were all TNG-clad at first), with a visible tendency towards the DS9 version. Still, several branches in Starfleet must have retained the TNG version longer than on the Enterprise. Actually, most of the non-DS9 personnel seen until season 4, and all higher-ranking non-DS9 officers seemed to wear the TNG variant. Examples include Calvin Hudson in "The Maquis", Dr. Lens from the Lexington in "Explorers", the crew of the USS Odyssey in "The Jem'Hadar", Thomas Riker in "Defiant" and finally Worf in "The Way of the Warrior". Most obviously the TNG uniforms could be witnessed in DS9: "Homefront" and "Paradise Lost", where also Sisko switched to this style -- even before Admiral Leyton announced that he would become Earth's security chief! It is possible that specifically Earth- or planet-based personnel retained the old colors, while space-based crews adopted the new ones beginning in 2369 or even earlier. Moreover, the dress uniforms remained the same, also on DS9. There may have been a directive that both variants were permissible for a limited time. Voyager consistently sported the new colors from the start (2371), while they were still changing at random on the Enterprise. Riker appeared in the 3rd season TNG uniform in VOY: "Death Wish" (2372). This Riker may have come from any year between 2366 to 2371.
Oddly, the year 2373 saw yet another new uniform. First featured in "First Contact" (2373), the new gray/black combination was quickly adopted by the DS9 personnel in the same year. Moreover, quite unlike it was the case with the inconsequent previous switch, all of Starfleet's personnel were seen with the new uniform after 2373. The crew of Voyager is the only notable exception. Equipped with replicators, they could have easily switched after contact was made with Starfleet (2374), but the old uniform was in use until the series finale (2378). Certainly the real-world reason is once again to establish a distinct look of the series. A fictional explanation could be that Janeway decided not to waste their scarce energy reserves on new uniforms (bearing in mind that even in the real-world US Navy implementing a dress code is to some extent at the captain's discretion).
Something that may be taken into account is the future and parallel timeline uniforms. The uniform in TNG: "Yesterday's Enterprise" had a different collar and an additional white belt. TNG: "Future Imperfect" and "Parallels" both showed the same uniform variant with an identical pattern to the regular TNG II uniform, only with different communicators. But more interestingly, there exist three episodes set in the future with identical uniforms, namely TNG: "All Good Things" (2395), DS9: "The Visitor" (2422), and VOY: "Endgame" (2404). There seems to be a good chance that this is the actual uniform of the future (or better: the uniform of the actual future), considering that it seems to be a constant in the repeated alterations to the timeline. Geordi still wears the "First Contact" uniform in VOY: "Timeless" (2389), which would put the introduction of the future style between 2385 and 2389.
|Depiction||Name||In use since||until||Duration|
|TOS Pilots||prior to 2254||2265||>11 years|
|TOS||2266||2268 to 2271||<5 years|
|TMP||2268 to 2271||prior to 2278||<10 years|
|Movie (w/ and w/o collar)||prior to 2278||after 2349||>71 years|
|TNG I||after 2349||2367||<18 years|
|TNG II||2366||2373||7 years|
|DS9 / Voyager||2369||2373||4 years|
|"First Contact"||2373||after 2389||>16 years|
|Future||prior to 2395||2422||>27 years|
Summarizing, there is nothing really inconsistent about the life spans of Starfleet's uniforms. On the contrary, we never see any uniform versions, even in flashbacks and time travels to the future, that we would have to reject as anachronistic. But the question remains whether Starfleet could possibly be so much into fashion that they would retain most of the various styles only for a few years, and replace them without any obvious reason. It would be somewhat more plausible if every single style had lasted at least one or two decades. The fact that Starfleet kept the most untypical uniform of the nine styles we know of for the by far longest time remains an oddity.
Starfleet uniform @ Memory Alpha
The arrowhead emblem
From at least 2254 ("The Cage") to 2268 (the end of TOS) an arrowhead symbol worn on their uniforms represented the crew of the Starship Enterprise NCC-1701. We could see the uniforms of four other ships (Antares, Constellation, Defiant and Exeter) and of Starfleet Command during TOS or ENT, all with symbols other than the arrowhead.
In all uniform variants since 2271, however, Starfleet's personnel has consistently been wearing the arrowhead (in many slight variations). Either the famous voyages of the Starship Enterprise have inspired Starfleet to adopt the ship's individual symbol for the whole organization, or the arrowhead had been a common identification symbol prior to TOS, and was worn exclusively on the Enterprise only for that limited period -- maybe because the Enterprise was always the fleet's flagship or something otherwise special.
The crew of the Kelvin are wearing the Starfleet arrowhead on their uniforms as soon as in 2233. This confirms the idea that in the Prime Universe the arrowhead represented all crews of Starfleet before it became a special symbol of the Enterprise for a limited time in the 2260s and possibly sooner.
The latter idea is supported by the fact that the long-range probe Friendship One (UESPA-1) in the Voyager episode of the same name sported the arrowhead as the symbol of the UESPA (United Earth Space Probe Agency) as early as in 2067. But Earth Starfleet has apparently abandoned the arrowhead symbol by 2143, as we could see a somewhat different, NASA-like Starfleet Command symbol, perhaps symbolizing a spacecraft trajectory, in ENT: "First Flight" and in other episodes taking place between 2151 and 2155. ENT: "Demons" finally showed a seal with this Starfleet symbol and the additional words "United Earth Space Probe Agency", implying that Starfleet Command is just a part of UESPA. If both organizations are the same or one is a department of the other, it is only plausible that symbols are interchangeable and that at a later date the arrowhead could come into use again -- even if the UESPA was renamed, demerged or abandoned some time between ENT and TOS.
The problem is not necessarily further complicated if we decide to take into account the "boomerang" symbol, as it could be found as the pennant on Federation Starfleet ships such as the USS Enterprise NCC-1701. This symbol was also visible in the courtroom in TOS: "Court-Martial". The boomerang may have been a crude or stylized version of any of the two other symbols in the 2260s. It is understandable that Starfleet may not have been content with its look and may have replaced it with the old UESPA/Enterprise symbol. The boomerang is also the individual ship emblem of the USS Defiant NCC-1764 during TOS (ENT: "In a Mirror, Darkly").
A modified boomerang reappears on the pennant of the (U.)S.S. Raven NAR-32450 in VOY: "Dark Frontier", denoting either a civilian ship registered in the Federation or a science ship. In this light it almost seems like the UESPA or a similar organization still exists in the 24th century and may have switched their emblem with that of Starfleet around 2270. But that is only speculation.
Usually one might expect that a Starfleet officer receives a promotion every few years, depending on his conduct and performance. Most permanent crew members in the various Star Trek series have moved up the ranks through the years, but some have not. There may be certain special conditions to consider. As Picard said to Kirk in "Generations", accepting a promotion to admiral would probably mean that he lost his command over a starship. This was also the reason why he declined the offer to become the head of Starfleet Academy (with the rank of admiral) in TNG: "Conspiracy", and why Kirk was not too sad when he was demoted at the end of "Star Trek IV". Riker remained commander during all his time under Capt. Picard, 15 years altogether. He declined a command of his own four times. It is obvious that there can be only one person with the rank of captain on a starship (the notable exception being the Enterprise-A with Captains Kirk, Spock and Scott).
Ensign Harry Kim, however, is a crew member who was never promoted, although no good reason becomes obvious. He finally complains about that in VOY: "Nightingale", blaming the exceptional circumstances in the Delta Quadrant for the stagnation, while he might be lieutenant, even lieutenant commander by now in the Alpha Quadrant. This may seem plausible, as the rank structure might need lower officer ranks. Still, why is Tom promoted to lieutenant (jr. grade) again in VOY: "Unimatrix Zero", after he had been demoted to ensign in VOY: "Thirty Days"? Clearly Harry Kim's record has been better in the meantime. Other crew members who were apparently let down include Lt. Commander Data. Like Riker, he has been holding this rank for 15 years, although in his case there was no apparent reason why he shouldn't move up to the rank of commander, just like Deanna Troi in TNG: "Thine Own Self" (the episode even has an ironic remark that Deanna now outranks Data). Curiously, Deanna's promotion went along with an exam to acquire command ability, but Data had been in command before without holding the rank of commander.
In "Star Trek (2009)" Cadet Kirk is promoted by Captain Pike to the Enterprise's first officer. Some time later Spock, acting captain at that time, puts him in command. At the end of the movie Kirk, who should nominally still be a cadet, receives his promotion to captain, skipping no less than five ranks! This is very odd and unprecedented in the history of Star Trek. It has been argued that Pike or Spock may have given Kirk a field promotion, one that Starfleet wouldn't revert after Kirk has saved the planet. But Kirk did not act single-handedly, he received crucial support from Spock and his other crew members. If anyone, then Commander Spock should have been promoted to captain. Also, no one else in Starfleet that we know of has ever been promoted because of a single merit. Ironically, the Prime Universe Kirk was demoted to captain after saving Earth in "Star Trek IV"! And even more ironically, when new Kirk commits a minor offense by cheating the Kobayashi Maru scenario, he is going to be disciplined, while after numerous more serious offenses he is promoted! So whatever we make of Kirk's incredibly premature promotion, it leaves a bad taste of Starfleet valuing isolated accomplishments or even "predestination" higher than constancy. Although it is not unprecedented in military history for outsiders to take leading positions, a military organization should not work like this.
O'Brien and other non-commissioned officers
The rank signs of officers at the time of early TNG are well-defined: one solid pip for the ensign, one solid and one hollow for the lieutenant junior grade, two solid for the full lieutenant, two solid and one hollow for the lieutenant commander, and so on. The supposedly existing lower ranks on the Enterprise have no insignia, a visual identification is impossible. Most importantly, there is no distinction between enlisted crewmen and non-commissioned officers (NCO). The obvious interpretation: there exist no non-commissioned officers at the time of TNG, just officers (who have graduated at Starfleet Academy) and crewmen (without graduation). Although this seems logical, it would be unfair to the crewmen, who could never rise in their rank. There would be no chance, with less of an effort than at Starfleet Academy, to receive a promotion to a non-commissioned officer rank, possibly as a field promotion. Becoming a "crewman first class" after years in service without any visible distinction seems anything but desirable.
Miles Edward O'Brien is wearing the solid pip of an ensign in TNG: "Encounter at Farpoint" and still in the (correctly in his case) recreated past of TNG: "All Good Things". From season 2 to 5 of TNG, his rank sign is the two solid pips of a lieutenant, and he is accordingly addressed by Riker in "Where Silence Has Lease".
Since TNG: "Family", however, we know that there are intended to be non-commissioned officers and that O'Brien is supposed to be one of them. Sergey Rozhenko introduces himself as an engineer and chief petty officer (CPO). Oddly, he identifies Miles O'Brien as another CPO -- but O'Brien is clearly wearing lieutenant rank signs at that time (two solid pips). It is possible that the writer of the episode thought that "(Transporter) Chief", as O'Brien was commonly referred to, was a rank rather than a function. Anyway, one theory is that there is an unknown number of non-commissioned officers aboard any starship, wearing the rank signs of the equivalent officer whose position they occupy. Although an ensign has a higher nominal rank than any NCO, it is possible for NCO ranks to perform the duty of an officer also in many real-world military organizations. Either because of their experience or because of a lack of officers. And perhaps, since no visual distinction is possible anyway, these NCOs would be referred to as if they were officers. Of course, that still wouldn't explain why Rozhenko could see that O'Brien is a CPO -- maybe Miles just looks like that?
Anyway, O'Brien's rank is clearly meant to be retconned by the viewer. He has never been demoted. He has never been an officer. He explicitly says "And don't call me 'sir'. I'm not an officer." to Muniz in DS9: "The Ship". Since his last appearances on TNG O'Brien is wearing rank signs different from the officers, definitely denoting him as something less than an ensign. At first, it was an empty pip, which would comply with the TNG rank system rather as a cadet than as an NCO. Nonetheless it is quite fitting, considering that the sign is identified as "Chief Warrant Officer" in the Star Trek Encyclopedia. Warrant officers are an intermediate group of ranks between an NCO and an officer but with an officer's duties in the US Navy, just like I have already speculated earlier. Also, it would confirm that O'Brien had received a promotion (rather than a demotion) prior to changing to DS9, which is mentioned in DS9: "Past Prologue", because a chief warrant officer is a higher rank than a chief petty officer.
O'Brien first wears the hollow pip on the Enterprise in TNG: "Realm of Fear", and he remains on board with this rank sign until TNG: "Rascals" (sixth season). The empty pip must have been introduced earlier. It appeared as early as in the second TNG season in "The Child" (Gladstone), then in TNG: "Reunion" (Maggie Hubble), TNG: "Night Terrors" (Gillespie), TNG: "The Next Phase" (Brossmer) and TNG: "The Quality of Life" (Kelso). There was also a woman in engineering in TNG: "The Next Phase" (fifth season) with this rank sign, and she was called "Chief" by Data. (It is actually her who saves the ship when she interrupts Picard's "engage" command that would have destroyed the ship.)
Later on in DS9, O'Brien's rank sign is modified to a combination of three chevrons and two dots, much like the master chief petty officer in the US Navy (three chevrons and two stars). This insignia is quite plausibly identified as "Chief Petty Officer" in DS9: "Hippocratic Oath". But has he been demoted? The Star Trek Encyclopedia calls this rank "Chief of Operations", which sounds rather like an occupation than a rank and makes no sense. Rather than that, the hollow pip could be such an exceptional rank sign, considering that O'Brien was always called "Chief", while he was wearing this one, and not "Chief Warrant Officer". This would mean that O'Brien hasn't been demoted, and he may have been promoted from chief petty officer to master chief petty officer since his time on the Enterprise. More evidence that he may have climbed up the ranks comes from DS9: "Shadow Play", where O'Brien states that he is a "Senior Chief Specialist", which is the NCO in the US Navy closest to an officer rank, a senior chief petty officer with the status of a specialist.
"Chief Warrant Officer" (left), "Chief of Operations" (right)
(Star Trek Encyclopedia III)
Overall, a rank identification system would not be very practical if there were only one rank sign for the highest NCO (namely the hollow pip) or an intermediate warrant officer rank, while all other NCO ranks (if there is one, there must exist more) as well as the enlisted crew would have no rank signs. Yet, this seemed to be the case at the time of (early) TNG. Crewman 1st Class Tarses in TNG: "The Drumhead", for example, has no rank sign that would have allowed to distinguish him from a crewman 3rd class. In this regard the revision to introduce combinations of chevrons and dots for the NCO ranks is clearly an improvement. But we can't really tell if this is so. Apparently O'Brien remains one of extremely few NCOs in Starfleet. Only Cadet Dorian Collins in DS9: "Valiant" (the girl from the moon), one more female crew member of that ship, and Burke from DS9: "Nor the Battle to the Strong" are wearing a similar or the same rank sign with three chevrons. The provisional(?) rank of Cadet(?) Collins is just another oddity, considering that most of her fellow cadets were "promoted" to officer ranks. All other non-commissioned personnel are referred to only as "crewman" or at most as "crewman first class".
Another strange fact about O'Brien is that he was at Starfleet Academy indeed, where he studied engineering and underwent an extensive education and training. The same might apply to Dorian Collins who, if she was really about to become an NCO, would even be in the same class as the future officers. If it is only a few more months and a few more courses, why would anyone not want to become an officer? Especially someone as brilliant as O'Brien who was (most likely) not married at that time? Maybe his engineering studies were so extensive that he neglected the non-technical part. In spite of his undeniable merits, he is more than lucky that Starfleet would ask him to teach engineering (DS9: "What You Leave Behind"), although he has never made it to officer.
Tom's and Tuvok's ranks
Sometimes Starfleet officers are not wearing the rank signs they are supposed to have. The most obvious example is Tom Paris and Tuvok. Tom is field promoted to lieutenant by Janeway in VOY: "Caretaker". We can't tell if he is supposed to be lieutenant or lieutenant jr. grade, as both would be called "Lieutenant". Anyway, he is wearing the full lieutenant rank sign (two solid pips) for most of the first season. Tuvok wears lieutenant commander insignia from the beginning, but the opening credits call him "Lieutenant", and he was occasionally referred to as "Lieutenant", never correctly as "Commander". Towards the end of the first season, Tom's rank sign was changed to lt. junior grade, and Tuvok's was changed to lieutenant. Were they both demoted?
Although it appears to be just retconning (bearing in mind that Tuvok was supposed to be lieutenant from the beginning, as in the episode credits), a demotion seems possible. Both were involved in the incident in VOY: "Prime Factors", making an illegal deal on Sikaris and putting the ship in danger. This seems like a sufficient reason to demote them. The demotion did not take effect immediately, but a couple of episodes later. Maybe Janeway was waiting for the result of an official investigation, before taking actions.
However, Tuvok's rank pips kept changing during "Cathexis", without any explanation what was going on. Also, there is still the question why Tom was demoted, although his role in the "Prime Factors" plot was only marginal, while B'Elanna's was not. Another problem is that Janeway promotes Tuvok to lt. commander again in VOY: "Revulsion". She says, "Over the past nine years I've come to rely on his insightful and unfailingly logical advice...", suggesting that he was having the same rank all the time.
After VOY: "Caretaker" Chakotay becomes Captain Janeway's first officer. But it is uncertain whether his provisional rank, which he retains for the whole run of the series, is commander (CMDR) or lieutenant commander (LTCDR). He is consistently called "Commander", but that would be the proper way to address a LTCDR as well.
Arguments for LTCDR:
His Maquis insignia clearly imitates that of a Starfleet LTCDR, with its two solid and one black stripe. It is the only one of its kind we ever see, and there is no canon reference to what it means, just common sense. Bearing in mind that Tuvok's and Tom's rank pips were fixed to reflect their intended ranks as mentioned earlier but Chakotay's remained the same, it seems he was always meant to be a LTCDR.
The former XO he replaced, Cavit, was a LTCDR. This doesn't have to mean a lot though, considering that the provisional promotion was a "political" decision and Janeway may have taken into account Chakotay's previous merits (perhaps he really was a Starfleet commander?), rather than those of his predecessor.
Arguments for CMDR:
He is never referred to as LTCDR on screen, not once in seven years. Even though it is correct to address a LTCDR as "Commander", he ought to be called "Lieutenant Commander Chakotay" whenever someone is talking about him to a third person. Data, for instance, was frequently referred to as a "lieutenant commander".
In VOY: "In the Flesh", the faux Boothby states Chakotay's serial number and rank as plain CMDR. Granted, that was a simulation, but Species 8472 must have got its info from Voyager.
He is called "Commander Chakotay" in the title credits and in all scripts.
Summarizing, although the visual evidence of his Maquis insignia looking like those of a LTCDR is compelling because it never changed, he is a consistently a CMDR in all written and spoken evidence. The latter appears to be stronger.
22nd & 23rd Century Starfleet Uniforms - incl. badges, ranks, spacesuits
24th Century Starfleet Uniforms - incl. badges, ranks, spacesuits
Other History Inconsistencies - about the TOS movie timeline, the UESPA, first contact with the Borg, Klingons in the Federation, etc.
Some screen caps from TrekCore. Some info about uniforms has been taken from Trekmania, some facts about O'Brien's rank from Captain Mike's Galactopedia. Thanks also to Alex Hoffmann, Kris, Dan, Guy Foster, Daniel, Nordic Knight, RotSman and Alexandre Oliveira for additional observations and suggestions about uniforms. Ryan pointed out an error I made about the warrant officers. Special thanks to Patrick Kovacs for countless observations about O'Brien's rank, to Adam for an idea about how O'Brien got "demoted" by a writer and to Tim for his suggestions about Chakotay's rank.